The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized English Language Training

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v3i1.199

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence (AI), English Language Learning, EFL/ESL, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML)

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the possible positive aspects of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in English language teaching that occur when training learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) or English as a Second Language (ESL). The study seeks to understand how AI technology and methodologies enhance language learning and teaching, including the unique possibilities that arise when considering learners and educators with an evolving role in increasingly larger education systems and educational environments. It seeks to understand the potential of AI for personalizing English language training. Also, by asking the question study, if there are methods including Natural Language Processing (NLP), Machine Learning (ML), and AI-based analytics or tools, can they personalize learning experiences for EFL-ESL learners? A qualitative study was completed through interviews with learners from different experience levels engaged in EFL or ESL programs that used AI-based tools in the pedagogy. The results demonstrate that AI has positive opportunities for personalized language education in the EFL and ESL contexts, the ability to enhance language skills in specific domains, and offer customized language learning experiences. This research has indicated challenges that surround cultural elements, technical challenges, and distinctly human teaching and learning elements. The research also offers helpful information for English language learning and recognizes the shifting nature of personal learning experience whether enhanced through AI, the practical requirement of incorporating AI will also provide a unique lens and perspective in English language learning and teaching, recognize the affordances AI can offer, alongside students and language learning never being exclusively cultural or human.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfitri, B. (2024). The Impact of Short-Form Content Tiktok on English Language Learning Development Among Generation Z: A Case Study of Students at Institut Elkatarie. Majapahit Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v1i2.103

Chen, H., Liu, K., & Zou, D. (2020). The use of artificial intelligence in language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(2), 1-15.

Li, M., & Ni, X. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 7, 73312-73324. Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2019). Mobile language learning innovation inspired by international mobility. In P.

Hubbard & M. Ioannou-Georgiou (Eds.), Teaching English reflectively with technology. Canterbury, UK: IATEFL.

Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2016). Mobile learning: The next generation. Routledge.

Wang, Y., Chen, N., & Zou, D. (2021). Intelligent English language learning systems: State-of-the-art review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5-6), 599-622.

Huang, R., Spector, J. M., & Yang, J. (2019). Educational technology: A primer for the 21st century.Springer.

Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2016). Mobile learning: The next generation. Routledge.

García Botero, G., Questier, F., & Zhu, C. (2018). Augmented reality in educational inclusion. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 225-237.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell 2016 & Creswell, 2017

Seidman, I. (2013). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.

Maxwell, J. A. (2012). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. Sage. Patton, 2015

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct.

Salmons, J. (2015). Qualitative online interviews: Strategies, design choices, and technological issues (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Janghorban, R., Roudsari, R. L., & Taghipour, A. (2014). Skype interviewing: The new generation of online synchronous interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 9(1), 24152.

Deakin, H., & Wakefield, K. (2014). Skype interviewing: Reflections of two PhD researchers. Qualitative Research, 14(5), 603-616.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Moser, A., & Korstjens, I. (2018). Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: Sampling, data collection and analysis. European Journal of General Practice, 24(1), 9-18.

Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2011). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Kvale, S. (2007). Doing interviews. SAGE Publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications

Downloads

Published

2025-09-30

How to Cite

Hashim, N. T., & Shaher, W. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Personalized English Language Training. Majapahit Journal of English Studies, 3(1), 39–57. https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v3i1.199

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.