Streamlining Poetry Assignment Submission: How Padlet AI Improves Accessibility and Efficiency for Indonesian ELT Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v4i1.696Keywords:
Padlet AI, Poetry Assignment, Accessibility, Efficiency, Indonesian ELTAbstract
The rapid integration of artificial intelligence into collaborative digital platforms has opened new possibilities for streamlining literature-based assignments in English language teaching. This study examines how Padlet, a cloud-based collaborative wall equipped with generative artificial intelligence features, influences accessibility and efficiency in poetry assignment submission among Indonesian undergraduate students studying English language teaching. The objective was to determine student perceptions of the platform's usefulness for managing poetry assignments and to explore the experiences underlying those perceptions. A convergent mixed-methods design was employed, combining quantitative data from a twenty-item Likert-scale questionnaire completed by twenty-six sixth-semester students with qualitative data from semi-structured interviews involving seven students. Descriptive statistics revealed that respondents rated the platform most favorably on accessibility and ease of use, with a mean score of 4.37, and least favorably, though still positively, on efficiency and time-saving, with a mean score of 3.88, yielding an overall grand mean of 4.08 across all items. Thematic analysis of the interviews produced recurring themes centered on platform accessibility, task efficiency, support for understanding poetic devices, and peer collaboration, alongside concerns about unstable internet connectivity and occasionally generic artificial intelligence suggestions. Students consistently viewed the platform as a scaffold rather than a substitute for independent literary interpretation. The findings suggest the platform can reduce the logistical burden of poetry assignments preserving space for authentic literary engagement, with practical implications for lecturers designing technology-assisted literature instruction in higher education.
Downloads
References
Ahmad, M., & Wilkins, S. (2024). Purposive sampling in qualitative research: A framework for the entire journey. Quality & Quantity. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-024-02022-5
Ali, M. I. (2025). From passive to active: Testing the effectiveness of thematic approach in ESL literature classroom. Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Teaching, 1(1), 1–16. https://parspectivepublishing.org/index.php/j-lilla/article/view/3
Ali, M. I. (2026). British history, society, and literature: A contextual approach for English education students. Penerbit Tahta Media. http://tahtamedia.co.id/index.php/issj/article/view/1852
Bellot, A. R., Plana, M. G.-C., & Baran, K. A. (2025). Redefining literature education: The role of ChatGPT in undergraduate courses. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35(5), 3185–3201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00497-3
Bhana, A. (2024). Unlocking the power of convergent parallel designs and triangulation for enhanced management and leadership research: A comprehensive theoretical exploration. Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science, 4(4), 1770–1793. https://doi.org/10.63922/ajmesc.v4i04.864
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Darwin, R., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students' perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
Kangasharju, A., Ilomäki, L., & Toom, A. (2024). Online poetry writing at school – Comparing lower secondary students' experiences between individual and collaborative poetry writing. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1380790. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1380790
Liu, W., & Wang, Y. (2024). The effects of using AI tools on critical thinking in English literature classes among EFL learners: An intervention study. European Journal of Education, 59(4), e12804. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12804
Pabur, H. E., Ali, M. I., Husain, S. W. J., Andries, F. A., & Posumah, J. (2025). Analyzing the disillusionment in Ernest Hemingway's The Sun Also Rises and its implication on English language learning. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 13(2), 5887–5906. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v13i2.5446
Posumah, J., & Ali, M. I. (2026). Digital linguistics: New frontiers in language learning and analysis. Penerbit Tahta Media, 1(1). http://tahtamedia.co.id/issj/article/view/2048
Ramadhani, A. S., Dewi, U., Syahnaz, M., & Kihwele, J. E. (2023). The effectiveness of using Padlet in collaborative writing based on students' perceptions. Child Education Journal, 5(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.33086/cej.v5i1.3767
Shahab, H., Zahur, H., Akhtar, N., & Rashid, S. (2021). Characteristics of ethical leadership: Themes identification through convergent parallel mixed method design from the Pakistan context. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 787796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.787796
Soro, S. H., Komara, E., Fathoni, K., & Witasari, R. (2023). Padlet-based collaborative writing and digital competence in EFL academic writing: Evidence from Indonesian higher education. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun. https://www.journal.scadindependent.org/index.php/jipeuradeun/article/view/2626
Storch, N. (2019). Collaborative writing. Language Teaching, 52(1), 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444818000320
Wang, C. (2024). Exploring students' generative AI-assisted writing processes: Perceptions and experiences from native and nonnative English speakers. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-024-09744-3
Zou, M., & Huang, L. (2023). To use or not to use? Understanding doctoral students' acceptance of ChatGPT in writing through technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1259531. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1259531
Zuana, M. M. M. (2024). The Viewpoints of Indonesian Pupils Regarding ELT in Shadow Education. Majapahit Journal of English Studies, 1(2), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.69965/mjes.v1i2.41
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Muhammad Ilham Ali, Ceisy Nita Wuntu, Jenie Posumah

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






